Pendampingan Budidaya Jagung Berbasis GAP untuk Penguatan Ekonomi dan SDGs Desa Banyuripan

Lila Pangestu Hadiningrum; Audi Novi Handayani; Aiyida Indana Sohiha; Rizky Amelia Febriana; Nur Khasanah; Muhammad Yusuf Mahmud Faizullah; Siwi Qori Fatimah

doi:10.59025/nt12rf47

Authors

Lila Pangestu Hadiningrum Universitas Negeri Islam Raden Mas Said Surakarta
Audi Novi Handayani Universitas Negeri Islam Raden Mas Said Surakarta
Aiyida Indana Sohiha Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
Rizky Amelia Febriana Universitas Negeri Islam Raden Mas Said Surakarta
Nur Khasanah Universitas Negeri Islam Raden Mas Said Surakarta
Muhammad Yusuf Mahmud Faizullah Universitas Negeri Islam Raden Mas Said Surakarta
Siwi Qori Fatimah Universitas Negeri Islam Raden Mas Said Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59025/nt12rf47

Keywords:

Budidaya Jagung; Ekonomi Produktif; GAP; SDGs Desa

Abstract

Pertanian jagung memiliki posisi strategis bagi ketahanan pangan dan ekonomi rumah tangga desa, tetapi manfaat ekonominya sering belum optimal karena praktik budidaya, pengelolaan panen, dan pemasaran masih berjalan terpisah. Kegiatan pengabdian ini bertujuan mendampingi masyarakat RT 02/RW 04 Desa Banyuripan dalam menerapkan prinsip Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) serta menghubungkan kegiatan produksi dengan pemasaran langsung melalui bazar. Metode yang digunakan adalah Participatory Action Research melalui identifikasi kebutuhan, perencanaan bersama, aksi kolaboratif, observasi, refleksi, dan penyusunan tindak lanjut. Aksi lapangan meliputi penanaman jagung pada 27 Juni 2026 di lahan sewa BUMDes Semulur, serta panen dan bazar pada 2 Juli 2026 di lahan samping Makam Santri Banaran. Kedua kegiatan berasal dari petak dan siklus produksi yang berbeda. Hasil menunjukkan terbentuknya pembagian kerja yang lebih terstruktur, meningkatnya pemahaman warga mengenai persiapan lahan, penataan area tanam, kebersihan panen, pemilahan hasil, dan pemasaran langsung. Bazar memperpendek rantai pemasaran sekaligus membuka ruang belajar mengenai pencatatan produksi dan nilai tambah. Program berkontribusi pada SDGs Desa, khususnya desa tanpa kelaparan, pertumbuhan ekonomi merata, konsumsi-produksi sadar lingkungan, dan kemitraan desa. Keberlanjutan program memerlukan pencatatan biaya-hasil, standar operasional budidaya, pendampingan pascapanen, dan penguatan kelembagaan pemasaran

References

B. P. Statistik, “Luas Panen dan Produksi Jagung di Indonesia 2024,” Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2025/08/15/2bb49a0af17ec89ac16971de/luas-panen-dan-produksi-jagung-di-indonesia-2024.html

K. N. Mthethwa, M. S. C. Ngidi, T. O. Ojo, and S. I. Hlatshwayo, “The determinants of adoption and intensity of climate-smart agricultural practices among smallholder maize farmers,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 24, p. 16926, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142416926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416926

H. S. Kassem, B. A. Alotaibi, M. Muddassir, and A. Herab, “Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of Good Agricultural Practices in Saudi Arabia,” J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 72–81, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2020.09.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2020.09.003

T. Abate et al., “Characteristics of maize cultivars in Africa: How modern are they and how many do smallholder farmers grow?,” Agric. Food Secur., vol. 6, p. 30, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s40066-017-0108-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-017-0108-6

J. Pretty and Z. P. Bharucha, “Integrated Pest Management for sustainable intensification of agriculture in Asia and Africa,” Biol. Rev., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 152–182, 2015, doi: 10.1111/brv.12103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/insects6010152

P. Battilani et al., “Aflatoxin B1 contamination in maize in Europe increases due to climate change,” Sci. Rep., vol. 6, p. 24328, 2016, doi: 10.1038/srep24328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24328

N.-J. Shih, H.-X. Chen, T.-Y. Chen, and Y.-T. Qiu, “Digital Preservation and Reconstruction of Old Cultural Elements in Augmented Reality (AR),” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 21, p. 9262, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12219262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219262

F. Cornish et al., “Participatory action research,” Nat. Rev. Methods Prim., vol. 3, p. 34, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1

A. Piccoli, “Community supported agriculture as an emancipatory tool: A participatory action research,” J. Rural Community Dev., vol. 20, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.63315/jrcd.v20i3.2581.

K. D. dan P. D. Tertinggal, “SDGs Desa,” Jul. 18, 2026, Kementerian Desa dan Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal. [Online]. Available: https://sid.kemendesa.go.id/sdgs

H. L. P. of E. on F. S. and Nutrition, “Reducing Inequalities for Food Security and Nutrition,” Committee on World Food Security, Rome, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe/insights/news-insights/news-detail/reducing-inequalities-for-food-security-and-nutrition/en

D. T. Konja and A. Abdulai, “Do outgrower schemes enhance technology adoption and productivity? Evidence from maize farmers in Northern Ghana,” Agribusiness, 2024, doi: 10.1002/agr.21967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21967

S. J. K. P. R. Indonesia, “Analisis Kinerja Perdagangan Jagung Tahun 2025,” Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://satudata.pertanian.go.id/details/publikasi/850

N. L. Shadowen, N. G. Guerra, R. Beveridge, and E. K. McCoy, “A resilient research approach: Using community-based participatory action research in a rural area of India,” J. Community Psychol., vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 2491–2503, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jcop.22429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22429

O. for E. C. and Development and F. and A. O. of the U. Nations, “OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2024-2033,” OECD Publishing, Paris, 2024. doi: 10.1787/4c5d2cfb-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/4c5d2cfb-en

C. C. IPCC, Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844

I. F. for A. Development, “Rural Development Report 2021: Transforming Food Systems for Rural Prosperity,” International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ifad.org/en/web/knowledge/publication/asset/45146573

I. L. Organization, “World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2024,” International Labour Organization, Geneva, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ilo.org/publications/flagship-reports/world-employment-and-social-outlook-trends-2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wow3.204

F. and A. O. of the U. Nations, “The Status of Women in Agrifood Systems,” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2023. doi: 10.4060/cc5343en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cc5343en

U. N. E. Programme, “Food Waste Index Report 2024,” United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/food-waste-index-report-2024